To help by doing sth definition

Hi, 1.She helps me vị my homework.2.She helps me khổng lồ vày my homework.Both ways are grammatically correct, right ? I"d like to ask about their meanings. Is there any difference between them or they are semantically the same ?Thanks in advance.


Bạn đang xem: To help by doing sth definition

*

Did you bởi vì a nayaritas.nets search? This exact question has been asked a few times before. I found these threads by typing help khổng lồ do
inkhổng lồ the Dictionary look-up box at the top of the page (mix to lớn English definition):"help me vị that"help to lớn vày or help do something?help lớn do something or help + inf
Many thanks.I"ll try three liên kết above. I am so sorry for mentioning again this matter, cycloneviv
*



Xem thêm: Các Nước Đông Nam Á Lục Địa Lý, Đông Nam Á Bao Gồm Hai Khu, Các Nước Đông Nam Á

Hello everybody!I don’t think that they’re always exactly equivalent. Help + bare infinitive sầu is used when the person who helps takes part in the action of helping. “She helped me clean the house” means that we cleaned the house together. In these cases “to” can always be inserted.But let’s take the following sentence: “The President gave a speech that helped me to lớn understvà the origin of the troubles”. In this instance the help is more general, it has the sense of broadening the mind: the speech didn’t literally participate in the effort of understanding. When this is the meaning of “help”, I feel that omitting the “to” would result in awkwardness. Do you agree with me on that?Skin
Hello everybody!I don’t think that they’re always exactly equivalent. Help + bare infinitive sầu is used when the person who helps takes part in the action of helping. “She helped me clean the house” means that we cleaned the house together. In these cases “to” can always be inserted.But let’s take the following sentence: “The President gave sầu a speech that helped me to understand the origin of the troubles”. In this instance the help is more general, it has the sense of broadening the mind: the speech didn’t literally participate in the effort of understanding. When this is the meaning of “help”, I feel that omitting the “to” would result in awkwardness. Do you agree with me on that?Skin
No. I do not see the problem either with She helped me to clean the house or with The President gave sầu a speech that helped me understand the origin of the troubles. Besides, the two statements are not parallel. And, her helping me clean the house does not have sầu lớn be physical. It may be inspirational. I vì, however, prefer not khổng lồ use "to" because it is acceptable và convenient.


Xem thêm: Nguồn Gốc Của Blue Collar Là Gì, Từ Điển Anh Việt White

I think all of the ideas above sầu are convincing enough. However, is there really no exact rule khổng lồ distinguish the difference? I go khổng lồ school & my teacher told me almost exactly the same as Skin. But in my own perspective, I vị think of something a little more different to share here. Let"s compare these two sentences:- He helps me vị my homework.- He helps me to vì chưng my homework.To what I feel is that, if sb helps you bởi vì sth, he physically helps you either with you or hyên alone. So, "he helps me vì chưng my homework" means he does it for me since I can"t really bởi it. When sb helps you to vị sth, he simply tell you how lớn bởi vì it. Therefore, "he helps me to vì my homework" means he helps me to have enough ability to vày what I don"t understand. He may show me the clues or any techniques lớn discern the homework and only then can I vị it myself. With the interference of "to", the sentence make the subject physically uninvolved in the actual object.However, I don"t know whether my idea can be generally applied or not!